![]() |
|
NATIONAL
HORTICULTURE
OPERATIONAL GUIDELINES1.INTRODUCTIONNational Horticulture Mission (NHM) will be implemented in all the States and Union Territories of India except the North Eastern States, Himachal Pradesh, Jammu & Kashmir and Uttaranchal (for which a separate Technology Mission for integrated development of horticulture exists) to promote holistic growth of the horticulture sector covering fruits, vegetables, root & tuber crops, mushroom, spices, flowers, aromatic plants, cashew and cocoa. Programmes for the development of coconut will be implemented by the Coconut Development Board (CDB), independent of the Mission. This will be a Centrally sponsored scheme in which Government of India shall provide 100% assistance to the State Missions during Tenth Plan. During the XI Plan, the Government of India assistance will be 85% with 15% contribution by the State Governments. 2.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Minister of Agriculture
|
: |
Chairman |
|
Ministers of Commerce, Health, Finance, Food Processing Industries, Panchayati Raj, Science & Technology, Rural Development
|
: |
Members |
|
Secretaries - Ministry/Department of Agriculture, Commerce, Health, Finance, Food Processing Industries, Panchayati Raj, Rural Development, Science & Technology Chairperson, NABARD Director General, ICAR
|
: |
Members |
|
Grower’s representatives & Experts (14)
|
: |
Members |
|
Mission Director |
: |
Member Secretary |
4.2 The Council
will be the policy making body giving overall direction and guidance to the
4.3 There will be an
Executive Committee (EC) headed by the Secretary, Deptt. of Agriculture &
Cooperation to oversee the activities of the
The EC will comprise of the following:
|
Secretary (A&C)
|
: |
Chairperson |
|
Secretaries - Ministry/Department of Commerce, Health, Food Processing Industries, Panchayati Raj, Rural Development, Science & Technology
|
: |
Members |
|
Institutions – Director General, ICAR; Director General, CSIR; Chairperson, NABARD; Additional Secretary (In charge of Horticulture, Department of Agri. & Cooperation); Additional Secretary & FA, Department of Agri. & Cooperation; Horticulture Commissioner; Chairman, APEDA; Managing Director, NHB; Managing Director, NCDC; Chief Executive Officer, National Medicinal Plant Board; Department of Ayurveda, Yoga, Naturopathy, Unani & Siddha (AYUSH), Chairperson, CDB; Agriculture Marketing Advisor, Department of Agri. & Cooperation; Joint Secretary, National Committee on Plasticulture Application in Horticulture. |
: |
Members |
|
Three Experts (Production, Post Harvest Management and Marketing)
|
: |
Members |
|
Mission Director |
: |
Member Secretary |
4.4 The EC will be empowered to reallocate resources across States and components and approve projects on the basis of the approved subsidy norms. EC will use its discretion in approving components of a project for which norms have not been prescribed. The subsidy for such components will not be more than 50% of the cost for small & marginal farmers and 30% of the cost for other farmers.
4.5 The Horticulture
Division in the Department of Agriculture & Cooperation will provide the
necessary support to the EC and the GC and will administer the NHM. The EC will
ensure smooth functional linkages among different agencies. The EC shall meet
every quarter but at least once in two months in the initial stages of the
4.6 A State level Executive Committee (SLEC) will be constituted by the State
Government under the Chairmanship of the Agricultural Production Commissioner,
or Secretary Horticulture/Agriculture having representatives from other
concerned Departments, the SAUs, ICAR Institutes, Grower’s Associations, etc
for overseeing the implementation of the programmes. Central Government will
nominate its representative who will be a Member in the SLEC. The State Mission
Director to be appointed by the State Government will be the Member Secretary
of SLEC. At the operational level, State Governments will have the
freedom to nominate, or create a suitable autonomous agency to be registered
under the Societies Registration Act for implementing the
4.7 State and sub-state level structures will be evolved keeping in view the need
for getting adequate returns for the produce of the farmers and eliminating
middlemen to the extent possible. The state will have the flexibility to
adopt an appropriate model viz cooperative federations in the pattern of NDDB,
incorporated companies (with cooperatives for procurement, joint sector for
processing and corporates for marketing) or orient existing institutions to
carry out the tasks of the
4.8 The State level agency will have the following functions:
(III) District Level
4.9 At the District level, the District Mission Committee (DMC) will be constituted by the State Government. It will be responsible for project formulation and monitoring. The DMC may be headed by the Chief Executive Officer (CEO) of Zila Parishad/CEO of District Rural Development Agency (DRDA) having as its members, representatives from concerned line Departments, growers’ associations, Marketing Boards, Self Help Groups and other Non-Governmental organizations. The District Planning Committee and Panchayati Raj Institutions (PRI) will be integrated/involved in implementing the programme depending on their expertise and available infrastructure. The District Horticulture Officer/District Agriculture Officer will be the Member Secretary.
(IV) Technical Support Group (TSG)
4.10 The
4.11 TSG will have the following role and functions:
(i) To visit the States regularly and frequently to provide guidance in organizational and technical matters.
(ii) To compile materials for conduct of regional workshops in respect of different plantations and different aspects viz. production, post-harvest management, processing, marketing. There will a year long calendar of capacity building and promotional events, workshops/seminars on different subjects in different regions.
(iii) To mount Supervision & Evaluation Mission.
(iv) To conduct studies on different aspects of horticulture in different regions.
(v) To document and disseminate case studies of success stories.
(vi) Assist the States in capacity building programmes.
(vii) Undertake publicity/information campaign to promote the Missions objectives.
4.12 The State Missions can also set up State level TSG for project formulation, appraisal and concurrent monitoring. State Missions will have freedom to hire consultants for providing technical support at the State as well as District levels.
4.13 The indicative administrative structure of the NHM at the national State and sub-state level is given in Annexure –I.
5.1 States will be required to prepare a State Horticulture Mission Document (SHMD) projecting a plan of action for the X Plan and XI Plan periods. The SHMD will form the basis for preparing Annual Action Plans (AAP). The AAP will be area based, on the basis of existing potential for horticulture development, available infrastructure for monitoring and implementation, available unspent balance out of previous release and capacity to absorb the funds in commissioning the project. The Ministry of Agriculture would communicate the tentative outlay for the year by April/May if not earlier to each State which in turn will indicate sector-wise/district-wise allocation. The agencies at the District level will prepare the Annual Action Plan (AAP) keeping in view their priority and potential and submit the plan to the State Horticulture Mission within the allocated sum. The States could engage TSG/Consultancy services for preparing the SHMD and AAP. The State Horticulture Mission in turn will prepare a consolidated proposal for the state as a whole, get it vetted by the State Executive Committee (SEC) and furnish 25 copies of the same to the Ministry of Agriculture (MoA) for consideration by the National Executive Committee. The SHM may spend up to 5% of the annual allocation for formulating the SHM and Annual Plans. Attempt would be made in the AAP to address all the issues relating to horticultural development covering production, post-harvest management and marketing. Format for submission of Annual Action Plan to the Ministry of Agriculture is given at Annexure-II.
5.2 The SHM will upload the AAP, as communicated to the National level EC indicating approval by SLEC, on the web site exclusively created for the purpose. The same will be replaced after its approval by National level EC. Attempts will be made to display the position regarding approvals of the AAP on line.
National Horticulture Board (NHB), Gurgaon
6.1 NHB will house the national level TSG and arrange to make payments to the personnel. An officer of NHB will be exclusively dedicated for interacting with the DAC. NHB will also implement programmes as per its mandate.
Directorate
of Cashew and
6.2 DCC will be responsible for coordinating and monitoring the activities relating to plantation crops excluding coconut and arecanut. They will also be responsible for organizing National level training programmes, seminars & workshops on cashew and cocoa on regular intervals.
Directorate
of Arecanut and Spices Development (DASD),
6.3 DASD will be responsible for coordinating and monitoring the activities on development of arecanut, spices, and aromatic plants. They will also be responsible for organizing National level training programmes, seminars and workshops on spices and medicinal & aromatic plants on regular intervals.
National
Committee on Plasticulture Applications in Horticulture (NCPAH),
6.4 NCPAH will be responsible for coordinating and monitoring activities relating to precision farming and hi-tech horticulture through the Precision Farming Development Centres (PFDCs).
Coconut
Development Board (CDB),
6.5 Although the CDB will function and implement its schemes on development of coconut, the Board will be involved in programmes involving coconut based farming system involving inter cropping of vegetables, flowers spices, aromatic plants etc.
Agricultural and Processed
Food Products Export Development Authority (APFDA),
6.6 APEDA, Ministry of Commerce will be involved to promote coordinated development of AEZ for horticultural crops.
Directorate
of Marketing & Inspection (DMI),
6.7 DMI will be involved for providing market intelligence and monitoring of programmes relating to marketing.
Ministry
of Food Processing Industries (MFPI),
6.8 MFPI will be responsible for implementing and monitoring programmes relating to processing of horticultural produce, out of their own budget provision.
National
Medicinal Plants Board (NMPB),
6.9 NMPB would implement
its scheme relating to development of medicinal plants in coordination with the
National
Horticulture Research & Development Foundation (NHRDF),
6.10 The NHRDF will be involved for monitoring programmes relating to development of vegetables and vegetable seeds.
6.11 These organizations’ schemes relating to horticulture will be coordinated with that of the NHM and in exceptional cases, these National level Agencies and others like NABARD, NCDC, NAFED, could be funded out of the NHM budget for taking up innovative projects.
7. POSITION OF ONGOING SCHEMES
7.1 Presently,
horticulture development programmes are being implemented through a number of
Schemes viz. National Horticulture Board (NHB) programmes, Coconut Development
Programmes, Technology Mission for Integrated Development of Horticulture in
North Eastern States (TMNE), Human Resource Development (HRD) in Horticulture,
Integrated Development of Horticulture in Tribal and Hilly Areas and
Horticulture Programmes under the Macro Management Scheme. Of these, the
schemes on HRD and Tribal Areas and Programmes under Macro Management will be
subsumed under National Horticulture Mission (NHM). The Macro Management scheme
provides flexibility to the States to allow new interventions within 10 per
cent of the total allocation for the State; which will be maintained in the
NHM. The NHB programmes are entrepreneur-driven and the Board would continue to
implement its programmes. The NHB will also provide a launching pad for the
8.
8.1 The
8.2 The interventions envisaged for achieving the desired goals would be varied and regionally differentiated with focus on potential crops to be developed in clusters by deploying modern and hi-tech interventions and duly ensuring backward and forward linkages. Details of the components, its estimated cost along with the approved norms of assistance is given in Annexure-III.


Research Development
8.3
The programmes under horticultural research will
concentrate on technology generation as appropriate to each region/state
keeping in view their specific agro-climatic and socio-economic conditions.
Emphasis will be on effective transfer and dissemination of production
technologies available in India and abroad. The Indian Council of Agricultural Research (ICAR) and Council of
Scientific and Industrial Research (CSIR) in association with State
Agricultural Universities (SAUs) and other research institutes/organizations in
the public and private sectors having capabilities in this area will be partners
in research programmes. Field experience of growers will be drawn upon to shape
and design necessary interventions. Research programmes towards this end
will be guided by an apex Research Advisory Committee (RAC) and will address
identified and emerging needs in the areas of planting material, production
technology, post harvest technology, processing and value addition. Such
research projects will work in tandem with Strategic Research Extension
Programme (SREP) at the District level under the Agricultural Technology
Management Agencies (ATMA) with focus on horticulture. Agencies taking up
research projects would be provided assistance in accordance with the ongoing
schemes of ICAR/CSIR without any financial commitment out of NHM budget. In
short, the idea is to identify the research areas needing priority attention
for achieving the
8.4 The
Production Distribution of Planting Material
8.5 Production and distribution of good quality seeds and planting material is an
important component of the
(i) Mother stock block maintenance under polycover with a maximum area of 500m2 to protect from adverse weather conditions
(ii) Raising root stock seedlings under net house conditions
(iii) Propagation house a maximum of 500m2 tropical polyhouse with ventilation having insect proof netting in the sides and fogging and sprinkler irrigation systems.
(iv) Hardening/maintenance in insect proof net house maximum of 2000m2 with 35% light screening properties and sprinkler irrigation systems.
(v) Pump house to provide sufficient irrigation with peak load of 5mm per day and water storage tank to meet at least 2 days requirement.
(vi) Soil sterilization -steam sterilization system with boilers.
8.6 It has been estimated that a Model nursery with an area of 4 ha would cost Rs.18.00 lakhs per unit. The Model nurseries which would be established under the Public sector will be eligible for 100% assistance of a maximum of Rs.18.00 lakhs per unit. The Model nurseries would produce 4 lakh plants per year. It would be the responsibility of the nurseries to ensure quality of the planting material. For model nurseries in the private sector the assistance will be 50% of the cost subject to a maximum of Rs. 9.00 lakhs per unit.
8.7 Small nurseries, covering area of about one ha, will have infrastructure facilities to hold 60,000 to 80,000 plants. These plants will be maintained for a period of approximately 9 months. Infrastructure for the small nurseries will consist of a net house of 2000m2, to screen 35% light. The floor of the net house will have raised beds of one-meter size, which will be covered with mulching sheet to control weed and ground pathogens. Micro sprinkler irrigation system will be provided over each bed throughout the net house. The nurseries will also have provision for solar sterilization of soil media to meet the contingency requirement of containers/transfer from small to big containers.
Small nurseries would cost Rs.3.00 lakhs per unit. The assistance will be to the extent of 100% of the cost for the Public sector and 50% of the cost subject to a ceiling of Rs.1.50 lakhs for the nurseries in the private sector. The small nurseries would produce at least 50,000 plants per year.
8.8 It would be the responsibility of the nurseries to ensure quality of the planting material through self accreditation. Nurseries will also be regulated under the legislation in force relating to seeds and planting material. The nurseries could be multi-crop or crop specific depending upon the requirements of planting material in the locality/project area. Hence, the type of nursery proposed to be established should be clearly indicated in the Action Plan. The Plan should also contain an assessment of the existing nurseries, the number of planting material being produced, crop wise and the additional requirement of nurseries.
8.9 No new Tissue
Culture (TC) units will be set up under the
8.10 The programme of production of disease free seedlings in vegetables will specifically apply to hybrid cultivars of vegetables in which case the seed is very costly and there is low germination of seeds and heavy mortality of seedlings take place when raised in open nurseries. Wherever necessary, plug technology and environment control for germination, growth and hardening of vegetable seedlings could be introduced. This will ensure production of seedlings in such a manner that early and late crops will be possible which in turn will ensure that production of vegetable takes place over a longer period and the alternation of glut and scarcity period is minimized. In addition, hybrid seeds will be selected after trials, which will ensure high production.
8.11The infrastructure facilities will consist of a green house with a maximum area of 2000 m2 designed for tropical conditions, with insect netting on the sides and rolling poly sheets. The plants will be propagated in plastic trays having small plugs. The plugs will be of varying sizes for different crops. Sprinkler irrigation system will be installed. The infrastructure for media sterilization i.e. steam boiler, holding bins, etc will also be provided.
8.12 The assistance for vegetable seed production will be Rs.50,000/- per ha for the Public sector and 50% of the cost subject to a ceiling of Rs.25,000/- per ha to the Private Sector limited to 5ha per beneficiary as credit linked back ended subsidy.
8.13 The State Horticulture
8.14 To facilitate proper handling, storage and packaging of seeds, assistance would be provided for creating infrastructure like drying platforms, storage bins, packaging unit and related equipments. 100% assistance will be provided to the public sector and the assistance to the private sector will be credit linked back ended subsidy limited to 25% of cost.
8.15 The
Rejuvenation / Replacement of senile plantations
8.16 Low productivity of perennial fruits, like mango, citrus, apple and the plantation crops, like coconut and cashew nut is, primarily, due to small size of holdings, preponderance of old and senile trees and poor management of inputs such as water, nutrients and pesticides. Thickly shaded mango orchards in the Malihabad areas of Uttar Pradesh, seedling orchards of guava, pear, kinoo and other citrus fruits throughout the country, including disease affected pepper, cardamom and cashew plantations are commonly seen in large tracts in different parts of the country. These have brought down the average productivity. Under the NHM, it is proposed to take up productivity improvement programmes through removal of senile plantations, re-plantation with fresh stock supported with appropriate and integrated combination of inputs, pruning and grafting techniques. The programme will be implemented through individual farmers, farmers’ cooperatives, self-help groups, NGOs, growers associations and commodity organizations. The assistance for rejuvenating senile plantations will be @ 50% of the cost subject to a maximum ceiling of Rs.15,000/- per ha limited to 2 ha per beneficiary.
8.17 Under the
8.18 Activities like green house construction, mulching, shade net and plastic tunnels would be promoted, the assistance for which is indicated below:
|
1. |
Green House (Hi-tech) |
Estimated Cost |
Pattern of Assistance |
|
|
a. Small & Marginal Farmers |
Rs. 650/ Sq. m. for hi-tech GH Rs. 250/- Sq. m. for normal GH |
50% of the cost subject to a maximum of Rs.325/Sq.m for hi-tech and Rs.125/Sq.m for normal GH, limited to1000 Sq.m./beneficiary |
|
|
b. Other farmers |
-do- |
33.3% of cost subject to a maximum of Rs.215/sq.m for hi-tech and Rs.67/Sq.m for normal GH limited to 1000 Sq.m. |
|
2. |
Mulching |
Rs. 14,000/ha |
50% of the total cost subject to a maximum of Rs. 7000/ha limited to 2 ha per beneficiary |
|
3. |
Shade Net |
Rs. 14 / Sq. m. |
50% of cost subject to a maximum of Rs. 3500/ 500 Sq.m limited to 2 ha per beneficiary |
|
4. |
Plastic Tunnel |
Rs. 10 / Sq. m. |
50% of cost subject to a maximum of Rs.5000/1000 Sq.m limited to 5 ha per beneficiary |
Precision Farming Development and Extension through PFDCs
8.19 Precision farming would involve the measurement and understanding of variability over time and space. Moreover, the system would use the information generated through surveys to manage this variability by matching inputs to conditions within fields using site-specific inputs. Finally, and most important, this system must provide for the measurement and recording of the efficiency of these site-specific practices in order to assess value on and off the farm. Thus, precision farming is technology enabled, information based, and decision focused.
8.20 The enabling technologies of precision farming can be grouped into five major categories: computers, Global Position System (GPS), Geographic Information Systems (GIS), sensors and application control. Some of the enabling technologies were developed specifically for agriculture and their origins date back more than 20 years. It is the integration of these technologies that has enabled farmers and their service providers to do things not previously possible, at levels of detail never before obtainable, and, when done correctly, at level of quality never before achieved. Availability of contiguous blocks of mono crops and equipments needed for survey, recording and analysis on near real time basis has made the Precision Farming technologies in these countries heavily equipment dependent.
8.21 Precision Farming in the Indian context is still in its infancy stage. A vast amount of data on various aspects like soil characteristics, climatic parameters, topographic features, crop requirement in terms of consumptive use and nutritional requirements have been generated and instruments needed for recording these parameters are also available. Technology for delivering the required amount of inputs to the crop through fertigation /chemigation have also been developed in the country. However, the application of precision farming as a package in the farmers’ field has not received much attention. This has been primarily due to the lack of awareness about the potential for increasing productivity and improving the quality of produce with minimum use of inputs. Secondly, there has been no serious attempt in the past to promote this technology by any agency. The infrastructure available in terms of remote sensing and GIS are yet to be used effectively in promoting precision farming. Hence, the development will have to be gradual in phases.
8.22 The focus would be firstly on technology
development which is suitable under Indian conditions. The Precision Farming
Development Centres (PFDC) will play a leading role in the development of
regionally differentiated technologies validation and dissemination. The PFDCs
are presently existing in 17 locations in the country which are mostly in the
SAUs, ICAR Institute and IIT, Kharagpur. On account of their experience in
conducting applied research on plasticulture application, they have the
expertise in terms of manpower and equipment. The PFDCs will be equipped
further with the necessary hardware and software needed for generating
information on precision farming techniques in the farmers field. Five of the
PFDCs viz. Indian Agriculture Research Institute, New Delhli,
Promotion of Integrated
Nutrient Management/Integrated
8.23 Assistance for INM/IPM will be @ 50% of cost subject to a maximum ceiling of Rs.1000/- per ha limited to 4 ha per beneficiary.
Assistance will also be available for developing facilities like disease forecasting units, Bio control labs, Plant Health Clinics and Leaf/Tissue Analysis labs as per the pattern of assistance indicated below:
|
Promotion of INM/IPM |
Estimated Cost |
Pattern of Assistance |
|
|
i. Sanitary and Phytosanitary (Public Sector) |
Project based |
Project based |
|
|
ii. Promotion of IPM |
Rs. 2000/ha |
50 % of cost subject to a maximum of Rs 1000/ha limited to 4 ha./ beneficiary |
|
|
iii. Disease fore casting units (PSUs) |
Rs. 4 lakhs/unit |
Upto Rs. 4 lakh/unit |
|
|
iv. Bio-control labs |
Rs. 80 lakhs/unit |
|
|
|
a) Public Sector |
|
Upto Rs. 80 lakh/unit |
|
|
b) Private Sector |
|
Upto Rs. 40 lakh/unit |
|
|
v. Plant health clinics) |
Rs. 20 lakhs/unit |
|
|
|
a) Public Sector |
|
Upto Rs. 20 lakh/unit |
|
|
b) Private Sector |
|
Upto Rs. 10 lakh/unit as credit linked back ended subsidy. |
|
|
vi. Leaf/Tissue analysis labs. |
Rs. 20 lakhs/unit |
|
|
|
a) Public Sector |
|
Upto Rs. 20 lakh/unit |
|
|
b) Private Sector |
|
Upto Rs. 10 lakh/unit as credit linked back ended subsidy. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
8.24 Assistance for setting up sanitary and phyto sanitary certification facilities would be provided to the Public Sector on project basis. Assistance will also be extended for meeting the cost of sanitary and phyto sanitary certificates for importing / exporting horticultural produce and planting material on case to case basis.
8.25 Organic farming in horticulture is becoming increasingly important. Its environmental and economic benefits have captured attention in many countries. Consumers’ demand for organically produced food products and society’s demand for more sustainable development provide new opportunities for farming and business around the world.
8.26 The basic rules of organic production are that the natural inputs are to be applied and the synthetic inputs are prohibited. But there are exceptions in both cases, certain natural inputs determined by various certification programmes to be harmful to human health or the environment are prohibited (e.g. Arsenic). Certain synthetic inputs determined to be essential and consistent with organic farming philosophy are allowed (e.g. Insect pheromones). An organic production system would be designed to:
8.27 In view of the growing demand for the organically produced food items worldwide the natural advantages in this regard needs to be fully exploited. In order to help the growers obtain the required certification for organically produced crops, awareness has to be generated through training and distribution of information material. For adopting organic farming for perennial and non perennial fruit crops, aromatic plants, Spices etc. additional assistance will be given over and above the area expansion programme @ Rs. 10,000 per hectare subject to a limit of 4 ha per beneficiary. For organic cultivation of vegetables, the maximum assistance will be limited to Rs. 10,000/- per ha. The NHM will also provide financial assistance up to a maximum of Rs 5.00 lakhs for a group of farmers covering an area of 50 ha, duly recommended by State Govt., on a case to case basis for certification of organic process/produce.
8.28 Human resource development through trainings and demonstrations is an integral
part of the
8.29 Trainers at the level of project officers, district horticulture officers, agricultural officers and extension workers will be trained in the modern technological advances in horticulture at various ICAR Institutes in or outside the State. These officers in turn, will train the staff and farmers in their respective regions. For this purpose, actual cost limited to Rs.50,000 per participant will be provided which will include travel material and training cost at the institute.
8.30 The ongoing scheme on HRD in horticulture will be subsumed under the NHM. The assistance will be for organizing training courses for supervisors, entrepreneurs, gardeners and field functionaries.
8.31 The focus will be to bridge the gap of knowledge and skill, both managerial and technical by training people to become entrepreneurs or self-employed in the horticulture sector and to create skills for employability in the horticulture units / farms and upgrade their knowledge. Emphasis will be on hands-on training rather than on theory.
8.32 The scheme has three components viz.
(a) training of supervisors
(b) training of gardeners
(c) training of entrepreneurs
8.33 The training programme for the Supervisors, Entrepreneurs to be organised
through selected State Agricultural Universities (SAU) / ICAR Institutes and
Gardeners training through the Krishi Vigyan Kendras and SAUs while the
departmental staff would are to be trained under various ongoing training
programmes. The training expenses for such trainings will be met through the
8.34 The minimum qualification for Supervisory & entrepreneurs training programme would be Higher Secondary and for Gardeners, Class-VIII (Middle) standard. The indicative cost for organizing the training courses for the Supervisors and Entrepreneurs would be to the tune of Rs.18.00 lakh as per the following breakup:
Cost structure for training of Supervisors and Entrepreneurs
Item Cost (lakh Rs.)
Stipend @ Rs.1000/- p.m (One year course for 25 trainees) 3.000
Course Material 0.125
Support to Institutes for strengthening infrastructure 10.000
(One time)
Operational Support 5.000
Total 18.125
8.35 Similarly the indicative cost for organizing training course for Gardeners will be Rs. 13.5 lakhs as per the following details:
Cost structure for training of Gardeners
Item Cost (lakh Rs.)
Stipend @ Rs.800/- p.m (Courses of 6 months for 25 trainees) 2.400
Course Material 0.125
Support to Institutes for strengthening infrastructure 6.000
(One time)
Operational Support 5.000
Total 13.525
8.36 The training institutions have been given the option to draw up the course details within this structure in consultation with the DAC.
8.37 The States which already have a strong horticultural production base and have institutional set up for training in horticulture will organizing the training programmes in horticulture.
8.38 The institutions identified for training should have the basic infrastructure facilities like class rooms, staff, hostel facilities etc.
8.39 The courses will be of one year duration for Supervisors and of six months for Gardeners and of three months for Entrepreneurs. In order to attract the candidates and more importantly retain them and prevent their drop out, a monthly stipend will be provided to them in the form of Boarding & Lodging Charges in the concerned Institute. The courses will be residential. At the end of the training, Supervisors will be awarded a Diploma in horticulture and Gardeners and Entrepreneurs a Certificate of training in horticulture. About 25 Supervisors, 50 Gardeners and 20 Entrepreneurs will be trained in each participating institution annually.
8.40 These trained people would be the potential candidates for employment by the Firms engaged in horticulture development.
8.41 In case the States wish to organize specialized training courses on horticulture related subjects, assistance will be provided for the same to the concerned Institutes directly based on the recommendation of the concerned State (s). Such training would generally be of short duration of 7 - 10 days for 20 to 25 participants.
8.42 Trainers who are required to
train others could be deputed for training abroad also, to a limited extent,
for which assistance would be made available for meeting the travel cost and
course fee. The concerned State Departments of
Horticulture/Agriculture/SHM would function as the nodal agency for this
purpose. Funds would be made available to the SHMs for meeting the expenses
of the candidates involved in implementation of the
Pollination Support through Bee-keeping
8.43 In order to maximize agricultural production, honeybee can be used as an important input. The overall responsibility of coordinating the beekeeping development programme in the State shall be vested in the identified State Designated Agency (SDA) or any institution/society having capability. The nodal State Designated Agencies (SDA) who have been implementing the beekeeping programmes will be integrated in the NHM and representatives of the respective SDAs will be Members of the State Level Executive Committee.
Development and Multiplication of Nucleus Stock
8.44 The All India Coordinated Research Project (AICRP) Centres and other institutes in public and corporate sector would be involved for developing nucleus stock of selected bee species (A. cerana and A. mellifera). The Institutes would have to submit a specific proposal indicating their existing infrastructure and deficiencies therein which need to be removed and the assistance would be considered on project to project basis subject to a maximum limit of Rs.3.00 lakhs.
8.45 The bee breeders from corporate/private sector shall be registered with SDA, and they will be selected based on their technical expertise, qualified personnel and infrastructure. The registered bee breeders shall be eligible for financial assistance in the form of grant-in-aid to a maximum of 50% of the cost of the additional facilities required limiting to Rs.2.50 lakhs per breeder mainly for strengthening infrastructure facilities. Each bee breeder will be required to multiply and produce a minimum of 3000 colonies per annum for a period of five years. If, however, a breeder is not in a position to meet the above target, the SDA will take appropriate steps to reduce the assistance proportionately.
Distribution of Bee Colonies, hives & equipments
8.46 The superior bee colonies produced by selected bee breeders as defined above, would be distributed to the farmers/beekeepers. To encourage purchase of superior bee colonies, subsidy support would be provided at the rate of 50 percent of the cost subject to a maximum ceiling of Rs. 350 per colony of four frames. The colonies of Apis cerana are cheaper and hence the subsidy amount in such cases will be less. The registered beekeepers shall be given a proper identification number by the SDA for each of their hives.
8.47 Standard bee hives are a pre requisite for the upkeep of bee colonies. Therefore, with a view to ensure supply of quality hives and equipments, subsidy support would be provided at the rate of 50% of the cost of hives/equipments or Rs. 450/- per set, whichever is less. The manufacturers of repute involved in the supply of bee hives and related equipments will be registered with the SDA. The SDA shall ensure that only those manufacturers who manufacture hives of standard specification are registered. Each beneficiary will receive subsidy support for 20 hives.
8.48 While supplying the honey bees, preference will be given to those farmers/bee-keepers who have undergone training on bee-keeping.
Technology Dissemination through demonstrations/ Front line demonstration
8.49 Latest technologies will promoted or crop specific cultivation, use of IPM/INM, protected cultivation, organic farming through farmer participatory demonstration in a compact area of one ha. This will be organized at strategic locations in farmer’s field for which assistance will be limited to 75% of the cost. For green house cultivation, the area will be limited to 500 Sq. m. Farms in the public sector, SAUs could be sites for front line demonstrations, for which 100% assistance will be provided.
8.50 Post harvest management includes packaging, grading, transportation, curing and ripening and storage. These facilities are essential for increasing the marketability of the horticulture produce, adding value to the produce, increasing profitability and reducing losses. It is proposed to create a network of infrastructural facilities for horticulture storages, transportation, marketing, packaging and grading, and export. The existing schemes of the National Horticulture Board (NHB), Directorate of Marketing and Inspection (DMI) and National Cooperative Development Corporation (NCDC) will be made use of to the maximum possible extent. In this context, specific programmes which would be taken up under the NHM would include establishment of pack houses, ripening chambers, cold storage units, Controlled Atmosphere (CA) Storage, supply of refer vans and mobile processing units besides support for market intelligence. All these projects will be entrepreneur driven through commercial ventures for which the Central Government assistance will be credit linked back-ended subsidy @ 25% of the total project cost in general areas and 33.33% in case of Hilli & Tribal Areas. State Govt. agencies will also be entitled to the assistance for such activities to the same extent. Assistance for market intelligence will be project based.
Creation of Market Infrastructure
8.51 The programmes for marketing are also project based. States Missions, after approval of the Executive Committee of the State Mission will submit viable projects to EC.
8.52 The main objectives of providing assistance under this component are (a) to induce investments from private and cooperative sectors in the development of marketing infrastructure for horticulture commodities (b) Strengthen existing horticulture markets including wholesale, rural haats; (c) focus on promotion of grading, standardization and quality certification of horticulture produce at farm/market level to enable farmers to realize better price; and (d) create general awareness among farmers, consumers, entrepreneurs and market functionaries on market related Agricultural Practices including contract farming. Assistance under the scheme will be provided on the following norms:
i) Credit linked back ended subsidy @ 25% of the capital cost of the project would be provided for new infrastructure projects for marketing of horticultural commodities and for strengthening and modernization of existing horticulture markets such as wholesale or rural haats. In hilly and tribal areas, rate of subsidy will be 33.33%.
ii) ‘Marketing Infrastructure’ for the purpose of this Scheme may comprise of any of the following:-
Functional infrastructure for collection/ assemblage, drying, cleaning, grading and standardization, SPS measures and quality certification, labeling, packaging, ripening chambers, retailing and wholesaling, value addition facilities (without changing the product form).
Market user common facilities in the project area like shops/ offices, platforms for loading/ un-loading/ assembling and auctioning of the produce, parking sheds, internal roads, garbage disposal arrangements, including drinking water, sanitation arrangements, weighing and mechanical handling equipments.
Infrastructure for Direct Marketing of horticulture commodities from producers to consumers/ processing units/bulk buyers.
iii) Assistance for setting up markets will be linked with market reforms and preference will be given to those States which amend their State Agricultural Produce Marketing Acts for facilitating alternate marketing by farmers/farmer groups involved in horticulture;
iv) Assistance will be available to individuals, Group of farmers/growers/consumers, Partnership/ Proprietary firms, Non- Government Organisations (NGOs), Self Help Groups (SHGs), Companies, Corporations, Cooperatives, Cooperative Marketing Federations, Local bodies, Agricultural Produce Market Committees & Marketing Boards and State Governments.
v) Cost of land in infrastructure projects will be restricted to 10 percent of the project cost in rural areas and 20 percent in Municipal areas. The entrepreneur will not alienate the land during the period of the loan for any purpose other than the purpose for which the project is sanctioned. The size of the project will be determined on the basis of economic viability and commercial considerations.
8.53 Special impetus would be provided to promote the export of horticultural produce through Agri-Export Zones, for which there is potential global market. Special groups will be set up for the purpose of examining and recommending appropriate legal and promotional measures for facilitating export of different horticultural products for consideration of EC, GC and the Government. State Mission Authorities will also make appropriate recommendations to the National Mission authorities for promoting exports of the State’s produce.
8.54 The State Mission authorities may align their marketing strategies keeping in view the programmes of national level agencies namely, National Horticulture Board, Directorate of Marketing and Inspection, National Cooperative Development Corporation (NCDC), Tribal Co-operative Marketing Development Federation (TRIFED) and Agriculture and Processed Food Products Export Development Authority (APEDA). The existing schemes of the National Horticulture Board (NHB), Directorate of Marketing and Inspection (DMI) and National Cooperative Development Corporation (NCDC) and Small Farmers’ Agri-Business Consortium (SFAC) should be used to the maximum possible extent.
8.55 Contract farming in horticulture could cover three categories: i) market – specification, ii) resource provision, and iii) production management. Market specification contracts are pre-harvest agreements that bind the firm and grower to a particular set of conditions governing the sale of the crop. These conditions often specify price, quality and timing. Resource provision contracts oblige the processor to supply crop inputs, extension, or credit, in exchange for marketing agreement. Production management contracts bind the farmer to follow a particular production method or input regime, usually in exchange for a marketing agreement or resource provision. In various combinations, these contract forms permit firms to influence the production technology and respond to missing markets without having to operate their own plantations. The concept of contract farming in the commercial realm of horticulture is still in its infancy and there can be different organizational models for contract farming, viz. Centralized Model, Nucleus Estate Model, Multipartite Model, Informal, or individual developed Model, and Intermediary Model. Assistance for infrastructure development (minus staff) is proposed to be provided under the NHM for promoting Contract Farming of horticultural crops. A Contract Farming unit will be established in each State within the Directorate of Horticulture/ Agriculture/SHM for coordinating the matter. A summary of the pattern of assistance for marketing is given below:
|
Sl. No. |
Item |
Estimated Cost |
Norms of Assistance |
|
1. |
Buy back intervention |
Project based |
Project based |
|
2. |
Establishment of Marketing Infrastructure for horticultural produce in Govt./Private/Cooperative sector |
|
Credit linked back-ended subsidy @ 25% of the capital cost of project in general case and 33.33% in the case of hilly, backward States. |
|
a) |
Wholesale markets |
upto Rs. 100.00 crores |
25 % of the capital cost of project |
|
b) |
Rural Markets/Apni Mandis/ Direct Markets
|
Rs. 15.00 lakh |
25 % of the capital cost of project |
|
c) |
Functional Infrastructure for collection, grading etc.
|
Rs. 15.00 lakh |
25 % of the capital cost of project |
|
d) |
Extension, quality awareness and market led extension activities for fresh processed products
|
Project based |
100% assistance |
8.56 Processing of horticultural produce and value addition is an important activity, which will be promoted by the Ministry of Food Processing Industries (MFPI) out of their ongoing schemes.
8.57 Drip and Sprinkler irrigation form essential input for improving productivity and quality of horticultural produce. Funding for promoting this technology will be provided through a separate scheme on Micro Irrigation for which the Guidelines will be issued separately.
9.1 Support to Cooperatives and other National Level Organisations for infrastructure
The NHM, in exceptional cases shall provide funds to the National level organisations for taking up innovative projects in the area of horticulture development, post harvest management, processing and marketing.
9.2 Institutional Strengthening, hire/purchase of vehicles
The Mission HQ will be strengthened with manpower including hiring of technical services, database development, use of Information Technology, development of software and procurement of hardware, hiring and if necessary purchase of vehicle, engagement of personnel on contract who can assist in the day to day functioning of the office including driver.
9.3 Collaboration with International Agencies
Attempts will be made to collaborate with the international agencies like FAO, World Bank, Asian Development Bank etc for taking up programmes for the development of horticulture. The FAO has a Unilateral Trust Fund (UTF) programme under which there is provision to operate projects on mutually agreed terms and conditions. The UTF would be availed for facilitating activities like import of planting material, hiring of International Domain Experts, organize study tours, organize training programmes under the aegis of the NHM. The funds for this purpose will be earmarked in the Annual Budget.
9.4 Evaluation & Other Studies
Term end evaluation will be conducted at the end of the X Plan. Concurrent evaluation will also be carried out by engaging suitable agencies. Assistance for such studies will be on project basis. The NHM would commission short term studies on various aspects of horticulture depending on the need and emerging requirements. Such studies will also be on project basis. Monitoring Missions, comprising of experts will be sent to the States from time to time by the National Mission which will be organized through TSG in the NHB.
10.OVERALL TARGETS UNDER NHM
10.1 Mission stands approval in principle up to the end of XI Plan. However, annual allocations have been approved only for X Plan Period. The tentative national level targets for the mission during the period up to XI Plan and during the remaining two years of X Plan are broadly as follows:
|
Programmes |
Total (X Plan) |
During XI Plan |
|
Area expansion with improved varieties |
5.38 |
27.90 |
|
Rejuvenation |
1.10 |
15.0 |
|
Integrated
|
6.0 |
21.0 |
|
Nurseries |
790 Nos. |
2040 Nos. |
|
PHM Infrastructure |
5096 Nos. |
13010 Nos. |
|
Markets |
490 Nos. |
930 Nos. |
10.2 The programme for XI Plan, however, will depend among other things, on the availability of funds for the purposes, which will be finalized later. The overall target is to raise production of horticultural produce in the country to the level of about 300 Million Tonnes by the end of XI the Plan.
|
Annexure-II
FORMAT FOR SUBMITTING ACTION PLAN BY STATE HORTICULTURE MISSION
Name of State:
Year of Action Plan: 2005-06
Summary Indicators:
Area, Production & Productivity (Year 200 )*
|
Sl.No |
Crop |
Area (000 ha) |
Production (000 t) |
Productivity (t/ha) |
|
1. |
Fruits |
|
|
|
|
2. |
Vegetables |
|
|
|
|
3. |
Spices |
|
|
|
|
4. |
Flowers |
|
|
|
|
5. |
M&A Plants |
|
|
|
|
6. |
Mushroom |
|
|
|
|
7. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
(* For the first year, the above information will constitute base line data)
Summary of Action Plan:
(Rupees on Lakh)
|
Sl.No |
Activity |
Balance as on 01.04.2005 |
Outlay as per action plan (2005-06) |
Percentage of total |
|
1. |
Research |
|
|
|
|
2. |
Production & Productivity |
|
|
|
|
3. |
Post Harvest Management |
|
|
|
|
4. |
Monitoring/TSG |
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
Physical: (quantifiable major outputs) for the year:
|
Sl.No |
Activity |
Ha. |
Sl.No |
|
No |
|
1. |
Additional coverage of area |
|
6. |
New Nurseries |
|
|
2. |
Rejuvenation |
|
7. |
PHM Infrastructures |
|
|
3. |
INM/IPM |
|
8. |
New Markets |
|
|
4. |
Protected cultivation |
|
9. |
New Processing units |
|
|
5. |
Organic farming |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
Total |
|
Annexure-II (contd.)
Format for submitting Detailed Action Plan
|
|
Description |
|
|
1. |
Background Information |
|
|
1.1 |
Geography & Climate |
|
|
1.2 |
Potential of Horticulture |
|
|
1.3 |
Land Availability |
|
|
1.4 |
SWOT Analysis |
|
|
2 |
Project Details |
|
|
2.1 |
Objectives & its Strategy |
|
|
2.2 |
Implementation Agency with contact address, phone & email ID |
|
|
2.3 |
Salient aspects of the Annual Action Plan for |
|
|
2.4 |
Plantation Development including Supporting Infrastructure |
|
|
2.5 |
Post Harvest Infrastructure and Management |
|
|
2.7 |
Production of Planting Material |
|
|
2.8 |
Establishment of New Gardens |
|
|
2.9 |
Fruits (Perennial) |
|
|
2.10 |
Fruits Non-Perennial |
|
|
2.11 |
Spices, Medicinal & Aromatic Plants |
|
|
2.12 |
Flowers |
|
|
2.13 |
|
|
|
2.14 |
Rejuvenation/Replacement
of Senile |
|
|
2.15 |
Protected Cultivation |
|
|
2.16 |
Promotion of INM/IPM |
|
|
2.17 |
Organic Farming |
|
|
2.18 |
HRD in Horticulture |
|
|
3. |
|
|
|
4. |
Annexures |
|
|
I. |
Map of District indicating potential belt and location of existing infrastructure facilities like nurseries, TC units, cold storage unit, processing units etc and location of proposed infrastructure to be created. |
|
Annexure-III
Norms of Assistance for programmes under NHM
|
S. No. |
Programme |
Estimated Cost |
Proposed assistance |
||
|
A. |
RESEARCH |
Central Government Institutes under ICAR, CSIR and others will take up research & development works out of their existing budget for which a Research Advisory Committee will identify the thrust areas of research. |
|||
|
B. |
|
||||
|
1 |
Production of planting material |
|
|
||
|
|
a) Public sector |
|
|
||
|
|
i. Model nursery (4 ha) |
Rs. 18.00 lakh/unit |
Maximum of Rs. 18.00 lakh per nursery |
||
|
|
ii. Small Nursery (1 ha.) |
Rs. 3.00 lakh per unit |
Maximum of Rs. 3.00 lakh per nursery |
||
|
|
iii. Rehabilitation of existing tissue culture units |
Rs. 8.00 lakh/unit |
Maximum of Rs. 8.00 lakhs per unit |
||
|
|
iv. Rehabilitation of TC labs and related units in SAUs |
Rs. 8.00 lakh/unit |
Maximum of Rs. 8.00 lakh per unit |
||
|
|
b) Private sector |
|
Credit linked back ended subsidy |
||
|
|
i. Model nursery (4 ha) |
Rs. 18.00 lakh/unit |
50% of cost limited to Rs. 9 lakh/nursery |
||
|
|
ii. Nursery (1 ha.) |
Rs. 3.00 lakh per unit |
50% of cost limited to Rs. 1.5 lakh/nursery |
||
|
|
iii. Rehabilitation of existing tissue culture units |
Rs. 8.00 lakh/unit |
50% of cost limited to Rs. 4.00 lakhs |
||
|
|
iv. Vegetable seed production |
||||
|
|
a. Public Sector (ICAR, SAUs & State Depts.) |
Rs. 50,000 per ha |
100% of the total cost |
||
|
|
b.Private sector |
Rs. 50,000 per ha |
50% of the total cost subject to maximum of Rs. 25,000/ha limited to 5 ha as credit linked back ended subsidy.
|
||
|
|
v. Seed Infrastructure |
||||
|
|
a. Public Sector |
Project based |
100% of cost |
||
|
|
b. Private sector |
Project based |
25% of cost as credit linked back ended subsidy |
||
|
2 |
Establishment of new gardens (ha.) |
||||
|
|
i. Fruits (Perennials) |
Rs. 30,000/ha |
75% of cost subject to a maximum of Rs. 22,500/ha limited to 4 ha per beneficiary in three installments of 50:20:30 subject to survival rate of 75%in 2nd year & 90% in 3rd year. |
||
|
|
ii. Fruits (Non-Perennials) |
Rs. 30,000/ha |
50%
of cost subject to a maximum of Rs. 15,000 per ha limited to 4 ha per
beneficiary in three installments of 50: |
||
|
|
iii. Flowers |
|
|||
|
(A) Cut Flowers |
Rs. 70,000/ha |
|
|||
|
a. Small & Marginal Farmers |
|
50% of the cost @ Rs. 35,000/ha limited to 2 ha. per beneficiary |
|||
|
b. Other farmers |
|
33% of the cost @Rs. 23,100/ha limited to 4 ha per beneficiary |
|||
|
(B) Bulbulous Flowers |
Rs. 90,000/ha |
|
|||
|
a. Small & Marginal Farmers |
|
50% of the cost @ Rs. 45,000/ha limited to 2 ha. per beneficiary |
|||
|
|
b. Other farmers |
|
33% of the cost @Rs. 29,700/ha limited to 4 ha per beneficiary |
||
|
|
(c) Loose Flowers |
Rs. 24,000/ha |
|
||
|
|
a. Small & Marginal Farmers |
|
50% of the cost @ Rs. 12,000/ha limited to 2 ha. per beneficiary |
||
|
|
b. Other farmers |
|
33% of the cost @Rs. 7,920/ha limited to 4 ha per beneficiary |
||
|
|
iv. Spices, Aromatic Plants |
Rs.15,000/ha (average) |
75% of cost subject to a maximum of Rs. 11,250/ha limited to 4 ha per beneficiary in three installments of 50:20:30 subject to survival rate of 75%in 2nd year & 90% in 3rd year |
||
|
|
v.
coastal horticulture |
Rs.15,000/ha (average) |
75% of cost subject to Rs. 11,250/ha limited to 4 ha per beneficiary
|
||
|
3 |
Rejuvenation/ replacement of senile plantation |
Rs. 30,000/ha (average) |
50% of the total cost subject to a maximum of Rs. 15,000/ha limited to 2 ha per beneficiary
|
||
|
4 |
Creation of water resources sources
|
||||
|
|
Community tanks on farm ponds on farm water reservoir -(No.) with use of plastics-100% assistance
|
Rs. 10.00 lakh/unit |
Upto Rs.10 lakh /unit of 10 Ha. |
||
|
5 |
Protected cultivation |
|
|
||
|
|
1. Green House (Hitech) |
|
|
||
|
|
a. Small & Marginal Farmers |
Rs. 650/ Sq. m. for Hi-tech Rs. 250/ Sq. m. for normal |
50% of the cost subject to a maximum of Rs.325/Sq.m for hi-tech and Rs.125/Sq.m for normal GH, limited to1000 Sq.m. per beneficiary |
||
|
|
b. Other farmers |
-do- |
33% of cost subject to a maximum of Rs.215/sq.m for hi-tech and Rs.67/Sq.m for normal GH limited to 1000 Sq.m. per beneficiary. |
||
|
|
2. Mulching |
Rs. 14,000/ha |
50% of the total cost subject to a maximum of Rs. 7000/ha limited to 2 ha per beneficiary |
||
|
|
3. Shade Net |
Rs. 14 / Sq. m. |
50% of cost subject to a maximum of Rs. 3500/ 500 Sq.m limited to 2 ha per beneficiary |
||
|
|
4. Plastic Tunnel |
Rs. 10 / Sq. m. |
50% of cost subject to a maximum of Rs.5000/1000 Sq.m limited to 5 ha per beneficiary |
||
|
6. |
Precision Farming development and extension through PFDCs
|
Project based |
100 % of cost to PFDCs. |
||
|
7. |
Promotion of INM/IPM |
||||
|
|
i. Sanitary and Phytosanitary (Public Sector) |
Project based |
project based |
||
|
|
ii. Promotion of IPM |
Rs. 2000/ha |
50 % of cost subject to a maximum of Rs 1000/ha limited to 4 ha./ beneficiary |
||
|
|
iii. Disease fore casting units (PSUs) |
Rs. 4 lakhs/unit |
Upto Rs. 4 lakh/unit |
||
|
|
iv. Bio-control labs |
Rs. 80 lakhs/unit |
|
||
|
|
a) Public Sector |
|
Upto Rs. 80 lakh/unit |
||
|
|
b) Private Sector |
|
Upto Rs. 40 lakh/unit as credit linked back ended subsidy. |
||
|
|
v. Plant health clinics) |
Rs. 20 lakhs/unit |
|
||
|
|
a) Public Sector |
|
Upto Rs. 20 lakh/unit |
||
|
|
b) Private Sector |
|
Upto Rs. 10 lakh/unit as credit linked back ended subsidy. |
||
|
|
vi. Leaf/Tissue analysis labs. |
Rs. 20 lakhs/unit |
|
||
|
|
a) Public Sector |
|
Upto Rs. 20 lakh/unit |
||
|
|
b) Private Sector |
|
Upto Rs. 10 lakh/unit as credit linked back ended subsidy. |
||
|
8. |
Organic Farming |
||||
|
|
1. Adoption of organic farming |
Rs. 20,000/ha |
50% of cost subject to a maximum of Rs.10,000/ha limited to 4 ha. per beneficiary. |
||
|
|
2. Vermi compost units |
Rs. 60,000/unit |
50% of cost subject to a maximum of Rs.30000/unit |
||
|
|
3. Certification |
Project based |
Rs.5 lakhs in cluster of 50 hectares |
||
|
9 |
HRD including horticulture institute |
Project based |
100% assistance |
||
|
10 |
Pollination support through beekeeping |
Rs. 1600 per colony with hive |
50% of the cost subject to maximum of Rs.800/ colony with beehive |
||
|
11 |
Technology dissemination through demonstration/Front line demonstration |
Project based |
75% of cost |
||
|
C. |
POST HARVEST MANAGEMENT |
||||
|
|
1. Pack houses |
Rs. 2.50 lakh/unit |
Credit linked back-ended subsidy @ 25% of the capital cost of project in general area and 33.33% in case of Hilly & tribal Areas. |
||
|
|
2. Cold storage units |
Rs. 2.00 crore/unit |
-do- |
||
|
|
3. C.A Storage |
Rs. 16.00 crore/unit |
-do- |
||
|
|
3. Ref. vans / containers |
Rs. 24.00 lakh/unit |
-do- |
||
|
|
4.
|
Rs. 24.00 lakh/unit |
-do- |
||
|
|
5. Market Intelligence |
Project based |
Project based |
||
|
|
6. Buy back intervention |
Project based |
Project based |
||
|
|
7.Establishment of Marketing Infrastructure for horticultural produce in Govt./ Private/ Cooperative sector |
|
Credit linked back-ended subsidy @ 25% of the capital cost of project in general case and 33.33% in the case of hilly and backward area. |
||
|
|
a) Wholesale markets |
upto Rs. 100.00 crores |
-do- |
||
|
|
b) Rural Markets/Apni Mandis/ Direct Markets |
Rs. 15.00 lakh |
-do- |
||
|
|
c) Functional Infrastructure for collection, grading etc. |
Rs. 15.00 lakh |
-do- |
||
|
|
d) Extension, quality awareness and market led extension activities for fresh processed products
|
Project based |
100% assistance |
||
|
D. |
PROCESSING & VALUE ADDITION |
|
The MFPI will sanction projects on food processing out of their budget provision. |
||
|
E. |
|
||||
|
|
(i) State & Districts Mission Structure including additional manpower & project preparation cost |
|
5% of total annual expenditure on the basis of appraised needs |
||
|
|
(ii) Support to cooperatives for infrastructural requirement |
|
Project based |
||
|
|
(iii) Institutional Strengthening, hire/purchase of vehicles, hardware/software |
|
Project based |
||
|
|
(iv) Technical Support Group (TSG) |
|
Project based subject to a ceiling of Rs. 5 crore per annum |
||
|
|
(v) Collaboration with International agencies like FAO, World Bank etc. |
|
Project based |
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Annexure-IV
INDICATIVE COST OF AREA EXPANSION OF SELECTED FRUIT CROPS
( In Rs.)
Crop |
Distance (meter) |
No. of Plants |
Cost of Planting Material (Grafted) |
Cost of Fert./ Pesticides and Other Input |
Total |
Apple |
6x6 |
277 |
13,850 |
25,000 |
38,850 |
|
Mango |
10x10 |
100 |
7000 |
14,000 |
21,000 |
|
Grapes |
05x05 |
360 |
7200 |
36,800 |
44,000 |
|
Grapes |
04x04 |
625 |
12500 |
80,000 |
92,500 |
|
Strawberry |
1x1 |
10,000 |
40,000 |
40,000 |
80,000 |
|
Litchi |
10x10 |
100 |
7000 |
14,000 |
21,000 |
|
Citrus |
|
|
|
|
|
|
a)Mandarine |
06x06 |
277 |
8310 |
20,000 |
28,310 |
|
b) Sweet |
06x06 |
277 |
7756 |
18,000 |
25,756 |
|
c) Sapota |
10x10 |
100 |
6700 |
14,000 |
24,700 |
|
Guava |
10x10 |
100 |
3000 |
10,000 |
13,000 |
|
Pomigranate |
05x05 |
400 |
8000 |
10,000 |
18,000 |
|
Aonla |
07x07 |
200 |
7000 |
10,000 |
17,000 |
|
Ber |
07x07 |
200 |
7000 |
8,000 |
15,000 |
|
05x05 |
400 |
14000 |
10,000 |
24,000 |